Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Hartin
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- John J. Hartin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a contested prod, the subject does not meet the criteria of WP:PERP. The victims are not famous, the crime was not unusual and the subject has not been to trial. J04n(talk page) 10:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, no special circumstances in this case. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As I said in the PROD Wikipedia is not a directory of people wanted byt the FBI or who MIGHT have committed a crime since he hasn't been found guilty in his absence. GAtechnical (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I agree that the fact that the subject has not been to trial is a very strong argument to delete the article. It is unethical for an encyclopedic project to keep this kind of information. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PERP and WP:GNG. He has neither been tried nor arrested....William 19:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.